World "Welcomes" Obama Win?!
The headline reads: “World Welcomes Obama Win….”
Source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-06-04-obama-world_N.htm
One thing in the story that particularly caught my eye was the following:
"He has a very appealing persona — elegant, fluent, strings lots of sentences together into paragraphs," Cox said. "But in terms of (his) actual policies towards the Middle East, Iraq, Iran, China, Europe — actually, we don't know."
Well, isn’t that interesting? We just don’t know, do we? And that’s because Obama lacks any kind of real experience in foreign policy. Yep – he does string those sentences together to make paragraphs (duh?). Of that there can be no argument. He is extremely glib, and talks a good story. Obama is convincing to those who are gullible and easily fooled. Obama has made himself look “hip” and “cool” to those for whom “hip” and “cool” are the only things that matter. He has painted himself to be as dramatic an orator as Martin Luther King, and the biased media has made him their new darling, portraying him in their accompanying story artwork with halos, auras, and beams of light shooting out of his head.
With all of his ability to “talk,” we know he’ll be a great appeaser, though. But the way he flip-flops on the issues, one can never tell just which way he’ll go. He can’t even make up his mind about the threat posed by Iran. One minute he says they “…do not pose a serious threat to us…” and then the next day he says “I’ve made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave.” Well, Mr. Obama - which is it? Can you maybe decide which of those lies about your position you are willing to stick with? And he wants to sit down and talk with them without any pre-conditions?
Obama is glib and gives very dramatic speeches. The gullible sheeple lap his words up like milk. Come on, America – wake up!!
In my opinion, Obama and his lies can be summed up in the following (not all inclusive) points:
- Obama is clearly against the individual liberties guaranteed by our Bill of Rights.
- He is clearly all for raising our taxes to fund the United Nation’s efforts to disarm America. He is all for raising our taxes period!
- He is clearly an elitist who wishes not to lead our country with principles, but seek more power with which to rule as a true fascist dictator.
- He is on the top ten list of most corrupt politicians:
o (http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2007/12/pelosi_reid_huckabee_obama_amo_1.asp)
o http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/12/judicial-watchs-top-ten-most-corrupt.html - Obama is anti self –defense and believes that no American citizen should have the means to defend themselves against criminal predators using the same degree of force (that the criminals use), which is the firearm (while he enjoys his entourage of armed body guards). This makes him a criminal enabler.
- He is against the ideas of individual self sufficiency upon which this country was built, and believes that the “nanny state” should provide for a person’s every need. Problem with that is that HE wants to be the one to decide what those needs are and how to meet them.
- Obama thinks that Americans have “broken souls,” http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/obama_the_savior.html), rural Americans are bitter, and that we cling to guns and religion. (So being couragous enough to defend ourselves with firearms, and believing in God makes us bitter?)
- He is married to a woman who has only recently been proud of her country “…for the first time…” I, as others, can’t even count the number of times I have been proud of my country. Michelle Obama, in my opinion, is a bitter, pretentious and racist hag.
- Do I really need to mention the “… 57 states” comment of his? Did we get a few more while I was sleeping? Or is he bringing Iran and some other muslim countries in as new states?
- He has no clue what the 2nd Amendment is all about, except that he doesn’t want individual Americans owning guns.
- Obama, in my opinion, LIES when he says that he supports the 2nd Amendment. His affiliations, voting record, and past activities (Joyce Foundation) all support the fact that he hates the 2nd Amendment and hates individual rights. He has been a huge proponent of gun control and in fact opposes citizens carrying concealed weapons. Does he oppose drunks who drive? Because Ted Kennedy’s car and drunken behavior have killed more people than all of my guns put together? Why isn’t he doing something about that?
- Obama wants to eliminate any gun shop from being within five miles of any school, but yet is perfectly fine with pornography shops being within five miles of a school.
- On Obama’s white grandmother’s comments about black people, he refers to her as a “…typical white person…” which says to me that he believes that ALL white people harbor racist attitudes. This to me classifies HIM as a racist and an ignorant bigot. This item will most likely not get much press, but if a white candidate referred to a “typical black person,” the liberal media would be all over it. http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/That_typical_white_person_line.html
- Obama wants guns off limits, and he wants selected topics of discussion during his candidacy placed off limits. Sounds like he wants to get rid of the 1st and 2nd Amendments to me.
- We live in the greatest country on the planet, and he wants to “change” that. Change it to what? A nation of subjects instead of citizens?
Here’s the way I see it: The world DOES welcome an Obama win, because an Obama win will be good for the (rest of the) world. Unfortunately an Obama win won’t be good for Americans, in my opinion. If elected to the Presidency of the United States, he will appease our enemies, particularly our radical muslim enemies, and sell the citizens of the United States into further slavery and dependence on foreign resources. He will appease the special interests and fail to help us reach energy independence, but continue to line his own pockets. He will further hand over the liberties of Americans to the United Nations and make us unable to defend ourselves as individuals and as a nation against attacks, both foreign and domestic. He will abandon Israel, something that the United States does only at its greatest peril. We will have an inexperienced, bigoted, corrupt, anti-American commander in chief if he gets elected.
If elected, he will tell his first lie in office, (he’s told many others already – but he’s not in the office of President yet – and hopefully never will be!) in my opinion, the day of inauguration when he takes the oath to “preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States of America” because he has no intention of preserving the individual liberties that served as the ideals that founded this great nation, and he has no intention of defending what our Constitution stands for.
Obama’s ideas and desires stand for nothing short of being anti-American, fascist, racist, anti-Semitist, and anti-freedom in my opinion. But OK, now I get it – I guess that would make the world extremely happy – to see America turned into a fascist, powerless state that caters to their every whim.
As an aside: In gathering material for this article, I did a Google search on “obama bad for america” and got 806,000 hits. I think that it’s no fluke that Obama inspires such sentiment in Americans:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=obama+is+bad+for+america
Here are just a few links about what Americans, and even one Israeli, have to say about Barack Obama:
- http://www.obamamustgo.com/
- http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/724781/barack_obama_is_bad_for_america.html
- http://www.nysun.com/comments/60639
- http://douglasvgibbs.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/why-obama-is-bad-for-america/
- http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0508/glick052008.php3
"My friends, we live in the greatest country in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it."
- Barack Obama

I am just an American citizen who is outraged by people who believe that the government is here to provide for our safety and every need. I know full well, and have taken ownership for the fact that the responsibility for the well being and security of my family is mine and mine alone. I do not need to live in a "nanny state" for my well being and that of my family.

0 comments:
Post a Comment